Shallow Explanations: The model identifies an error but doesn’t explain how and why it should be corrected (i.e., what is wrong)

Sub-section Authors Title
Components Simone Teufel. Argumentative zoning: Information extraction from scientific text. 1999.
Components Christian Stab and Iryna Gurevych. Identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 46–56, Doha, Qatar, October 2014. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Components Yohan Jo, Jacky Visser, Chris Reed, and Eduard Hovy. Extracting implicitly asserted propositions in argumentation, 2020.
Components Milad Alshomary, Shahbaz Syed, Arkajit Dhar, Martin Potthast, and Henning Wachsmuth. Counter-argument generation by attacking weak premises. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, pp. 1816–1827, Online, August 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Relations Jian Yuan, Zhongyu Wei, Donghua Zhao, Qi Zhang, and Changjian Jiang. Leveraging argumentation knowledge graph for interactive argument pair identification. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, pp. 2310–2319, Online, August 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Relations Farjana Sultana Mim, Naoya Inoue, Shoichi Naito, Keshav Singh, and Kentaro Inui. LPAttack: A feasible annotation scheme for capturing logic pattern of attacks in arguments. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 2446–2459, Marseille, France, June 2022. European Language Resources Association.
Schemes Vanessa Wei Feng and Graeme Hirst. Classifying arguments by scheme. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 987–996, Portland, Oregon, USA, June 2011. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Schemes Yi Song, Michael Heilman, Beata Beigman Klebanov, and Paul Deane. Applying argumentation schemes for essay scoring. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining, pp. 69–78, Baltimore, Maryland, June 2014. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Fallacies Ivan Habernal, Raffael Hannemann, Christian Pollak, Christopher Klamm, Patrick Pauli, and Iryna Gurevych. Argotario: Computational argumentation meets serious games. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, pp. 7–12, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 2017. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Fallacies Claire Bonial, Austin Blodgett, Taylor Hudson, Stephanie M. Lukin, Jeffrey Micher, Douglas Summers-Stay, Peter Sutor, and Clare Voss. The search for agreement on logical fallacy annotation of an infodemic. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 4430–4438, Marseille, France, June 2022. European Language Resources Association.
Fallacies Zhijing Jin, Abhinav Lalwani, Tejas Vaidhya, Xiaoyu Shen, Yiwen Ding, Zhiheng Lyu, Mrinmaya Sachan, Rada Mihalcea, and Bernhard Schölkopf. Logical fallacy detection, 2022.
Debates Jianzhu Bao, Jingyi Sun, Qinglin Zhu, and Ruifeng Xu. Have my arguments been replied to? argument pair extraction as machine reading comprehension. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp. 29–35, Dublin, Ireland, May 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Debates Annette Hautli-Janisz, Zlata Kikteva, Wassiliki Siskou, Kamila Gorska, Ray Becker, and Chris Reed. QT30: A corpus of argument and conflict in broadcast debate. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 3291–3300, Marseille, France, June 2022. European Language Resources Association.
Debates Kasia Budsziyska, Mathilde Janier, Chris Reed, Patrick Saint-Dizier, Manfred Stede, and Olena Yakorska. A model for processing illocutionary structures and argumentation in debates. In 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), Vol.~14, pp. electronic–medium. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2014.
Debates Zlata Kikteva, Kamila Gorska, Wassiliki Siskou, Annette Hautli-Janisz, and Chris Reed. The keystone role played by questions in debate. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Discourse, pp. 54–63, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea and Online, October 2022. International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
Debates Shoichi Naito, Shintaro Sawada, Chihiro Nakagawa, Naoya Inoue, Kenshi Yamaguchi, Iori Shimizu, Farjana Sultana Mim, Keshav Singh, and Kentaro Inui. TYPIC: A corpus of template-based diagnostic comments on argumentation. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 5916–5928, Marseille, France, June 2022. European Language Resources Association.